Alderman & Alderman - Hartford Connecticut Lawyers
Home | Connecticut Lawyers | Bankruptcy Law | Business Law | Creditors Rights| Hiring | Legal Links | News |   Sitemap

Connecticut Lawyers, Connecticut Attorneys, Hartford Lawyers, New Haven Connecticut Lawyers, Stamford Connecticut Lawyers, Connecticut Bankruptcy Lawyers, Connecticut Environmental lawyers, Chapter 11 Lawyers, Reorganization Lawyers Bankruptcy Lawyers, Connecticut Bankruptcy Lawyers, New York Bankruptcy lawyers,  Chapter 11 Lawyers, Bankruptcy Reorganization Lawyers, United States Bankruptcy Court Lawyers, Hartord Bankruptcy Lawyers, New Haven Bankruptcy Lawyers
Connecticut Business lawyers, Connecticut Environmental Lawyers, Connecticut Intellectual Property Lawyers
Alderman
& Alderman 
Results Oriented Legal Solutions

" SuperLawyerLogo Removed:  
Please Read Why






TELECOMMUTING RULES

This is a reprint of an article that first appeared in Alderman & Alderman's Client Advisor (our quarterly newsletter).   Subscribe Here.

After a trial balloon on the subject of regulating home offices caused an uproar, the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) issued a formal directive that should soothe concerns about possible intrusions into workers' homes. The directive is intended to   guide OSHA compliance officers charged with enforcing OSHA rules.

The crux of the directive is that OSHA will not inspect home offices for  violations of federal safety and health rules, and it does not expect  employers to do so either. The directive also states that an employer is  not liable for an employee's home office. If OSHA receives a complaint  abouta home office and a specific request from an employee, it may  informally let an employer know about the home office condition, but it  will not follow up with the employer or the  employee.

OSHA will conduct inspections of other home-based worksites, such as home   manufacturing operations, when it receives a complaint or a referralindicating the presence of a violation of a standard threatening physical  harm or posing an imminent danger. An employer is responsible for hazards caused in home worksites by materials, equipment, or work processes that   the employer provides or requires to be used in an employee's home.

Examples of activities that might prompt such an inspection include electronics assembly, using unguarded crimping machines, or handliing potentially hazardous materials without adequate protection. Such an inspection, however, would be confined to the actual work environment, not   to an entire  dwelling.


Reprint rights are available upon request.  For more information, please call us at 860.249.0090  



[an error occurred while processing this directive]